The ultimate solution to relying on foolish technology is to rein in our energy consumption. Regrettably, humans appear to be foolish and greedy beings. However, if we are to hand our living Earth over to our children and grandchildren, we have to know when “enough is enough.” There is no doubt it would require an arduous discipline to let go of our luxurious lifestyle and change the spendthrift habits of our society. However, if that is the only way to ensure a sustainable and peaceful future, then we as a species must acquire a bit of wisdom. Let us pause and seriously ask ourselves how much energy we really need in our day-to-day lives, and work immediately on reforming our energy-wasting world.
The best course for Japan is to abolish all nuclear power stations at once. It is a mystery to me how people don’t realize this after witnessing the tragedy of the Fukushima accident.
via Japan risks nuclear disaster for consumer convenience – CSMonitor.com.
Hiroaki Koide is probably a good critic of the nuclear industry in pointing out dangers perhaps possessed by weaknesses in design, but here he seems to be making a serious mistake. Nuclear power is currently more expensive than using other fuels. See the Wikipedia entry on this.
So if people were greedy, wouldn’t it have been more sensible to use other forms of fuel to produce energy?
The argument about greed tends to lend itself to the notion that the free market doesn’t work. But here the free market was not what resulted in the use of nuclear power, instead it was specific policy decisions that pushed things in this direction. So shouldn’t that policy be criticized?
In general, the free market is governed by laws which in turn are based on the notion of rights. The idea is to have the correct set of rules such that self-interest helps to work in the interest of everyone.
Adam Smith put it this way, “By directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.”
In this case, the difficult part might be setting up rules so that nuclear plant owners can be made fully accountable for damages they do via accidents. If they were fully accountable, in my opinion, it’s unlikely we’d be using nuclear fuel to generate energy on the scale it is used today. The technology does not appear to be safe enough yet. At least in light of the current problems in Fukushima. (Of course, even here, many assure us there will be no increase in cancer anywhere in Japan, but I am quite skeptical of this.)
What do you think, is the major problem facing modern Japan greed?